Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Have you seen this ??


Founder of The Meat Cutter's Club

Status: Offline
Posts: 5562
Date:
Have you seen this ??


USDA updates meat safety cooking temperatures
 
WASHINGTON – In updating its recommendation for safely cooking pork, steaks, roasts and chops, the US Department of Agriculture recommends cooking all whole cuts of meat to 145° F as measured with a food thermometer placed in the thickest part of the meat, then allowing the meat to rest for three minutes before carving or consuming.

Ground beef, veal, lamb and pork should be cooked to 160° F and do not require a rest time. The safe cooking temperature for all poultry products, including ground chicken and turkey, remains 165° F.

"With a single temperature for all whole cuts of meat and uniform three- minute stand time, we believe it will be much easier for consumers to remember and result in safer food preparation," said Elisabeth Hagen, Under Secretary. "Now there will only be three numbers to remember: 145° for whole meats, 160° for ground meats and 165 for all poultry."

USDA is lowering the recommended safe cooking temperature for whole cuts of pork from 160° F to 145° F and adding a three-minute rest time. The safe temperature for cuts of beef, veal and lamb remains 145° F, but the department is adding a three-minute rest time as part of its cooking recommendations. Cooking raw pork, steaks, roasts, and chops to 145° F with the addition of a three-minute rest time will result in a product that is both microbiologically safe and at its best quality.

A "rest time" is the amount of time the product remains at the final temperature after it has been removed from a grill, oven or other heat source. During this time, its temperature remains constant or continues to rise, which destroys pathogens.

USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service has determined it is just as safe to cook cuts of pork to 145° F with a three-minute rest time as it is to cook them to 160° F, the previously recommended temperature, with no rest time. The new cooking suggestions reflect the same standards that the agency uses for cooked meat products produced in federally inspected meat establishments, which rely on the rest time of three minutes to achieve safe pathogen reduction.

Historically, consumers have viewed the color pink in pork to be a sign of undercooked meat. If raw pork is cooked to 145° F and allowed to rest for three minutes, it may still be pink but is safe to eat. The pink color can be due to the cooking method, added ingredients or other factors. Cured pork (e.g., cured ham and cured pork chops) will remain pink after cooking.

Only by using a food thermometer can consumers determine if meat has reached a sufficient temperature to destroy pathogens of public health concern, USDA said. Any cooked, uncured red meats – including pork – can be pink, even when the meat has reached a safe internal temperature.

 

MeatPoultry.com, May 24, 2011
by Meat&Poultry Staff


__________________

Leon Wildberger

Executive Director 



Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 286
Date:
RE: Have you seen this ??


Wow I saw this info it is Crazy I did Serve Safe back in October with these new changes posted and didnt even realize the temps were changed this much for pork!

__________________


Veteran Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 564
Date:
RE: Have you seen this ??


I rarely cook my beef or lamb beyond 125 with a 5 minute rest. Pork chops or loin roasts should be a little pink in the middle otherwise they just get tough.

__________________


Moderator

Status: Offline
Posts: 1513
Date:
RE: Have you seen this ??


I'm glad they finally put pork at a reasonable number. 160 is just too high. Of course it's way outdated and because of trichinosis, but I understand that's never in farmed U.S. pork anymore. Wild maybe. I know some old cookbooks even recommended to cook pork to 170 or more.

I tell customers not to ever cook pork loin beyond 150. I think maybe you could do a shoulder a little higher?

 

I like my beef cooked to 140 and don't like the USDA or anyone saying the minimum is 145.
It's hard to tell customers 140 (or less) when USDA says 145.



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard